Archived Pages from 20th Century!!
A GALLERY OF REGRETTABLE FOOD
download time for this page @ 14.4: 60 seconds
What were they thinking? How did they eat this bilge?
Good questions, but you won't find them answered here. This is a simple introduction to poorly photographed foodstuffs and horrid recipes. It's a wonder anyone in the 40s, 50s and 60s gained any weight; it's a miracle that people didn't put down their issue of Life magazine with a slight queasy list to their gut, and decide to sup on a nice bowl of shredded wheat and nothing else. It wasn't that the food was inedible; it was merely dull. Everything was geared for a timid palate fearful of spice.
It wasn't non- nutritious - no, between the limp boiled vegetables, fat-choked meat cylinders and pink-whipped-jello dessert, you were bound to find a few calories that would drag you into the next day. It's that the pictures are so hideously unappealing. Such as this appalling flesh-log, here.
What can you do, other than load it into torpedo bay two and shoot it into the briny deep?
Even if you were used to eating marshmallow-studded tubular loafs, is this the best example of the genre?
All trademarks, photos and illustrations taken from old magazines belong to whoever bothers to write me and tell me stop using them, and has sufficient lawyerage to make me wet my drawers.
The logos for this site and the formica-boomerang pattern (reconstructed from memory of our 1962-era kitchen) are by James Lileks. Take anything you like; please link back to this site.
Mmmmmm. . . preservative-laden.